Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Archeology essays

Archeology essays The object in question today is a recent found scrubbing tool seemingly used as far back as 1500 AD. From this object we can see remains of some kind of film or paste on it indicating that it was some how used for a scrubbing of the body. We found the first of this astounding artifact in a remote area of the New World buried under an ancient washroom. The object is long with a curve at the center of it for flexibility and has thousands of short brushes at the end of it put neatly into a uniform pattern. The object was a mystery at the time of it being found, but by looking at the context we can infer that was definitely used as a scrubbing object for some part of the body. We found this object under an ancient bathroom in association with a porcelain sink and wooden surfaces buried deep in the ground in the New World. There were quite a few found recently across the world and scientists have given it a name as unknown brush, because the use of it is a mystery, until today. We have found clear evidence through association that this brush was used as a cleaning device for teeth. It was widely used by nearly every person on the planet and many books have been written as to how teeth were cleaned in the ancient times. The discovery of these brushes was the first material evidence found to support these writings of a brush that cleaned the ancients teeth. The association clearly shows that the brush was associated with some kind of cleaning of the body, so theories of painting and artwork can be eliminated. By finding it next to an ancient sink we can truthfully say that it was used as a tooth-cleaning unit. The material it is made of, strictly from our observations, seems to be a plastic base and some kind of ancient fur used as the bristles. This shows us that ancient man was capable of dental hygiene. The brushes have very beautiful decorations on them with all different kinds ...

Saturday, November 23, 2019

U.S. President William McKinley - Fast Facts

U.S. President William McKinley - Fast Facts William McKinley (1843 - 1901) served as Americas twenty-fifth president. During his time in office, America fought in the Spanish-American War and annexed Hawaii. McKinley was assassinated near the start of his second term.   Here is a quick list of fast facts for William McKinley. For more in depth information, you can also read the William McKinley Biography Birth: January 29, 1843 Death: September 14, 1901 Term of Office: March 4, 1897-September 14, 1901 Number of Terms Elected: 2 Terms; Was assassinated soon after being elected to his second term. First Lady: Ida Saxton William McKinley Quote: We need Hawaii just as much and a good deal more than we did California. It is manifest destiny.Additional William McKinley Quotes Major Events While in Office: Spanish-American War (1898)Annexation of Hawaii (1898)Open Door Policy/Boxer Rebellion (1899-1900)Gold Standard Act (1900) States Entering Union While in Office: None Related William McKinley Resources: These additional resources on William McKinley can provide you with further information about the president and his times. William McKinley BiographyTake a more in depth look at the twenty-fifth president of the United States through this biography. Youll learn about his childhood, family, early career, and the major events of his administration. Spanish-American WarThis brief conflict in 1898 between Spain and the United States arose out of Spanish policies in Cuba. However, many claim that yellow journalism was at least partially to blame with their pro-rebel sentiments and the way they dealt with the sinking of the Maine. Tecumsehs CurseEvery president between William Henry Harrison and John F. Kennedy who has been elected in a year ending with a zero has been assassinated or died while in office. This is called Tecumsehs Curse. Territories of the United StatesHere is a chart presenting the territories of the United States, their capitals, and the years they were acquired. Chart of Presidents and Vice PresidentsThis informative chart gives quick reference information on the presidents, vice-presidents, their terms of office, and their political parties. Other Presidential Fast Facts: Grover ClevelandTheodore RooseveltList of American Presidents

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Ford vs Detroit Electric Car Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Ford vs Detroit Electric Car - Case Study Example While Detroit Electric Company capitalizes on its technological innovations as its core competitive advantage in the market, the development of an electric car by Ford still remains near, yet so far a realization. Since 1966, according to Flint the Forbes magazine editor, Ford has been stressing on the plan to develop a viable electric car in 5 to 10 years. By 2009, Ford believed that this dream could be realized by 2010, but it still remains a plan. The failure to meet these plans has been dampened by the advanced innovations and technology In Detroit Electric, who announced laid down plans to start large sale manufacturing and selling of electric cars in the first quarter of 2010, with these sales expected to hit 270,000 vehicles by 2012. The lithium battery technology is the latest development towards realization of this goal (Brown, 2012). Q1. The organization structure used in Detroit Electric cars is the decentralized organizational structure that leads to differentiation in pr oducts and specialization. Rather than produce their vehicles, Detroit Electronics outsource their vehicles from specialized manufactures; their work being to impart the finished vehicles with finishes that identify the company (LaMonica, 2009). Detroit has therefore assumed the structure of a virtual corporation where engines are manufactured and fitted by Proton in Malaysia, while the company just modifies the cars to distinguish the style and to offer an identity to these vehicles. Outsourcing to specialized manufactures, and settling on finishing and aesthetic work ensures specialization, and the company does not have to meet the cost required in producing these vehicles. Q2. The differing organization structure is to blame for Ford’s inability to produce an electric vehicle, when Detroit Electric has been able to make true its dream of an electric vehicle within four years of its founding. Contract manufacturing in Detroit ensures the company does not have to mind about the required technological facilities to meet this goal, as these costs are passed on to the contractor, Proton in this case (Lamonica, 2009). Instead of concentrating in designing and making the facilities to produce these vehicles, Detroit Electric has to concentrate on enhanced research and development strategies to improve its technological advancement in vehicle manufacturing. This is portrayed by the launching of lithium battery, and the rapid response to produce these electric cars. On the other hand, Ford has to set aside massive budgets to modify and advance their plants before launching any electric car manufacturing program. For example, Ford has set aside $ 450 million in Michigan as part of the company’s aggressive plan in advancing an electric vehicle program (Media Ford, 2011). Ford has been delaying these plans due to economic crisis and stiff competition, which has eaten into the company’s profitability. The company felt stinging effects as in the 2008 global economic meltdown. This has been well observed in the case of the SUV models that marked about 55% of total sales before the crisis. These sales declined sharply resulting to decreased profitability (Richard & Henry, 2003). Specialization has been the strength behind Detroit Electric success. Q. 3 Cooperation of international companies is largely affected by economic dynamics in the market. For example, the Euro crisis may